Ja, ist dem So?
Maestro
Active Ingredient: Octinoxate 3%
Cyclohexasiloxane, dimethicone, isododecane, alcohol denat, vinyl dimethicone/methicone silsesquioxane crosspolymer, phenyl trimethicone, acrylates/polytrimethylsiloxymethacrylate copolymer, peg-10 dimethicone, disteardimonium hectorite, fragrance, nelumbium speciosum flower extract, limonene, benzyl salicylate, synthetic fluorphlogopite, linalool, benzyl alcohol, propylene carbonate, caprylic/capric triglyceride, disodium stearoyl glutamate, water, citrus aurantium amara (bitter orange) flower oil, butylphenyl methylpropional, aluminium hydroxide, hexyl cinnamal; may contain: iron oxides, titanium dioxide
Kommt jetzt auch zu uns: L'oréal Nude Magique Foundation
Active Ingredient: Octinoxate 3%; Other Ingredients:
Dimethicone, Cyclohexasiloxane, Isododecane, Alcohol Denat., Vinyl Dimethicone/Methicone Silsesquioxane Crosspolymer, Phenyl Trimethicone, Acrylates/Polytrimethylsiloxymethacrylate Copolymer, PEG-10 Dimethicone, Disteardimonium Hectorite, Water, Propylene Carbonate, Disodium Stearoyl Glutamate, Aluminum Hydroxide. May Contain: Titanium Dioxide, Iron Oxides.
http://www.frillseeker.ie/blog/attn-...w-loreal-paris
Aus meinem obigen Link, der komischer Weise zerhäckselt wurde:
"See, Nude Magique Eau de Teint pretty much started life as Giorgio Armani's Maestro Fusion foundation a couple of years ago: it's basically the same, um, base. A fine, watery fluid composed in part of volatile oils which evaporate on the skin for a nearly-nude (crucially different to never nude though) result on the skin that's not greasy or shiny. The benefit of oils as the carrier and the base being so runny is that there are no binders like talc to result in the cakey appearance traditional foundations often deliver. So it's an intriguing formulation on that score."
Nachtrag:
http://www.lifesentropy.com/2013/07/...on-makeup.html